Scientists have long reasoned that fingerprints help humans grip objects by creating friction, because a few primates and tree-climbing koalas also have fingerprints.

But a new study found that if fingerprints help people grip things, it's not since they create more friction.

Scientist Peter Warman, from the University of Manchester in England, broke his finger into a machine that measures friction, while his mentor Roland Ennos slid a piece of acrylic glass, called Perspex, across the finger. To their shock, they found that no matter how hard they pulled the glass, the friction would barely increase.

In these experiments, with two solid objects, friction should be proportional to the force of the glass on the finger, so the harder they slid the glass, the extra friction should be produced. Though, the finger was not behaving like a normal solid; it was behaving like rubber.

With rubber, friction is proportional to the contact area between two surfaces, not how hard they push together. When the researchers used glass strips of different width in their experiment, they found that the wider strips formed the most friction.

Because our fingertips are ridged, not smooth, when we grab an object we essentially have less of our skin in contact than we would if we didn't have fingerprints. To make a strong grip, our fingers must touch as much of an object as possible.

The result only shows that fingerprints don't tighten our grasp on smooth surfaces. The authors think that the ridges on our fingerprints might still have helped our primate ancestors grab rough surfaces, such as when hiking a tree. Fingerprints could also drain water from our finger pads and help us keep a dry grip during rain.